triofriend.blogg.se

1. #Pi arduino i2c example two way data wiringpi full
2. #Pi arduino i2c example two way data wiringpi code
3. #Pi arduino i2c example two way data wiringpi plus

We will also release a range of new Edge Rack and Cluster Module designs to take full advantage of Cluster Blade over the coming months. Physically compatible with the same Rack and Cluster products as Quattro and leveraging BitScope's experience building Pi Clusters, Cluster Blade is specially designed to create robust industrial grade clusters of virtually any size with Raspberry Pi.Ĭluster Blade offers more than twice the power capacity, full remote management for each node, pre-emptive cooling, system monitoring and integrated diagnostics support.

#Pi arduino i2c example two way data wiringpi code

I might code this in when I have time if it doesn't get added officially.We're excited about this because this new model represents a huge step up for commercial, industrial and cluster computing applications when used with our latest product Cluster Blade, which we're also announcing today.Ĭluster Blade more than doubles the power of its predecessor, adding a full function control plane and active cooling system to turn this latest Raspberry Pi, with its 64-bit kernel running in 8G of RAM and booting over the network into the most powerful SBC cluster solution available. I did e-mail Gordon a link to this thread and I already had a look-see at the wiringPiI2C.c file to see what it would take to add this kind of functionality. Code written so far mimicked the other commands already found in the firmware, ie more than one byte allowed in an i2c transaction. Guess I better look into the standards of i2c communication as I am currently modifying the firmware of the mod-tc-mk2-31855 to customize for my application. I think other olimex uext devices follow suit in this multiple byte i2c communication but have not tried any of the others.

#Pi arduino i2c example two way data wiringpi plus

To read temperature you send 0x21 and read 4 bytes in return (internal temperature of the max31855 plus external type k thermocouple). To set a gpio pin you have to send the command in hex followed by the data (0 or 1). I see many places with this device where more than one byte need passed. Is it unusual to pass more than one byte at a time in i2c? I'm not very familiar with using this type of communication. Of course, since wiringPi is "open source", you could just add in the functionality yourself, were you so inclined, and had the time to do so, thereby adding to the community effort. adding extra functionality into wiringPi itself, whilst gordon (the author) is "on the forum" the suggestion may be better made directly on the wiringPi website (and discussed with him). Good to see that you managed to find a "workaround" in the end - but I think that your "device" is somewhat unusual. I realize one can use the standard read and close functions by including unistd.h but for the novice it would make wiringPi I2C library a better helper tool. I would suggest expanding the wiringPi I2C helper functions to include a function that would allow to pass in the "number of bytes" to read (and possibly write) as well as a close function.

Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the MAX31855 so I cannot say whether that works O.K., but, hopefully, someone else will be able to advise you better.Ĭode: Select all //setup i2c to mod-tc on 0x23

z80), I've written my own 'C' code for some of the same devices but structured around the device's own "architecture" rather than, for example, treating a port expander as something that (justs) provides a number of new, individually numbered, "GPIO pins". However, personally, since my "low-level" background is 8-bit, parallel-bus-like systems (eg. wiringPi does provide very good, "pin-based" (Arduino-like) support for quite a few I2C chips. some I2C devices is that "clock-stretching" is not supported. The only "known bug/issue" that I've seen reported in the forum here and elsewhere w.r.t. that is already handled by the kernel modules/drivers. In my experience all the I2C devices I've tried (so far) "just work" without "worrying about" the signalling/handshaking at the "low-level" you describe above - ie. START | ADDRESS | W | ACK | GET_TEMP | ACK | STOP | START | ADDRESS | R | ACK | DATA0 | ACK | DATA1 | ACK | DATA2 | ACK | DATA3 | NACK | STOPĭATA0, DATA1, DATA2, DATA3 - The 32 bits of data that comes from MAX31855. Make sure to read MAX31855 datasheet to decode the data. Read the data that comes directly from MAX31855.